Head to head

PETLIBRO Luma vs UBPet C41: which should you choose?

A side-by-side comparison of the two automatic litter boxes using our catalogue's rating criteria, one value at a time. Scores are relative to all the models we have reviewed.

PETLIBRO Luma, studio packshot

PETLIBRO Luma

7.6/10
Overall score

Main drawbackHeavy appliance makes regular repositioning awkward

Check price on Amazon → Read the full analysis →
UBPet C41, studio packshot

UBPet C41

8.1/10
Overall score

Main drawbackWaste drawer needs regular attention, especially with several cats

Check price on Amazon → Read the full analysis →

Our verdict based on your priorities

  • Priority: “Waste bin capacity”PETLIBRO Luma 8.5 / 10 vs 7.3
  • Priority: “Unit weight”UBPet C41 8.6 / 10 vs 6.6
  • Priority: “Equipment”UBPet C41 8.3 / 10 vs 7.6

Criterion by criterion

Comparison of PETLIBRO Luma and UBPet C41 by criterion
Criterion PETLIBRO Luma UBPet C41
Waste bin capacity 8.5 advantage 7.3
Unit weight 6.6 8.6 advantage
Equipment 7.6 8.3 advantage

A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using such small differences to pick a winner would imply more precision than we can offer.

Side-by-side specifications

Specifications for PETLIBRO Luma and UBPet C41
SpecificationPETLIBRO LumaUBPet C41
Minimum cat weight1 kg1 kg
Maximum cat weight10 kgNot provided
Usable interior volumeNot provided106 L
Waste bin capacity11 L6,7 L
Width59,2 cm50,8 cm
Depth57,3 cm63 cm
Height71,4 cm57,1 cm
Entry threshold height34 cm20,3 cm
Unit weight14,9730841337 kg10 kg
Noise levelNot provided42 dB
For which animal?CatCat
Cat monitoringWeight monitoringWeight monitoring
Safety featuresPresence detectionWeight sensor
Odor control systemCarbon filterAirtight waste compartment
Cat trackingWeight trackingWeight tracking

Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, as recorded in our analyses. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.

Which is right for you?

PETLIBRO Luma

Leads on 1 criterion out of 3 compared

  • Waste bin capacity: 8.5/10 vs 7.3/10 (11 L vs 6,7 L)
  • Tray type: Open
View PETLIBRO Luma →

UBPet C41

Leads on 2 criteria out of 3 compared

  • Unit weight: 8.6/10 vs 6.6/10 (10 kg vs 14,9730841337 kg)
  • Equipment: 8.3/10 vs 7.6/10
View UBPet C41 →

As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →

Frequently asked questions

Which is rated higher, PETLIBRO Luma or UBPet C41?

UBPet C41 scores 8.1/10, compared with 7.6/10 for PETLIBRO Luma, using the same scoring criteria.

Which wins on “Unit weight”?

UBPet C41 wins on “Unit weight”: 8.6/10 compared with 6.6/10 for PETLIBRO Luma. Recorded values: 10 kg versus 14,9730841337 kg.

Which wins on “Waste bin capacity”?

PETLIBRO Luma wins on “Waste bin capacity”: 8.5/10 compared with 7.3/10 for UBPet C41. Recorded values: 11 L versus 6,7 L.

Which wins on “Equipment”?

UBPet C41 wins on “Equipment”: 8.3/10 compared with 7.6/10 for PETLIBRO Luma.

More useful comparisons

An error on this page? Report it